national vs globalism

n our article “Americans Asked to Pick Nationalism or Globalism,” Jerry Davich calls for every American to have a defensible stance on this issue and this is what I am asking for this paper: You provide a detailed and well-researched stand on the issue of globalism or nationalism. In addition, we also read Jonathan Haidt’s essay “When and Why Nationalism Beats Globalism.” In his work, Haidt attempts to explain the moral psychology behind both parties and suggests new strategies. I want you to keep this awareness in mind as an aid to presenting your own argument.In short, this is an argumentative analysis of globalism vs. nationalism in the past and in today’s politics. Use some of your sources to define the issues and terms as they are used in today’s conversation. You may also use reliable news sources to frame the current issue. But many of your sources will be editorial or scholarly. These will be in depth arguments and analysis concerning the polarity of these two terms. And a few will be primarily historical. You will first present the scope of the issues and move on to what approach you determine is the better course and why. It is highly encouraged that you put together an outline of your points and evidence. It is also highly suggested that you make time to revise and proof. I look forward to reading your work. Good luck.Search entries or authorWords: 5 pagesSources: 5 sourcesMLA FormatIn our article “Americans Asked to Pick Nationalism or Globalism,” Jerry Davich calls for every American to have a defensible stance on this issue and this is what I am asking for this paper: You provide a detailed and well-researched stand on the issue of globalism or nationalism. In addition, we also read Jonathan Haidt’s essay “When and Why Nationalism Beats Globalism.” In his work, Haidt attempts to explain the moral psychology behind both parties and suggests new strategies. I want you to keep this awareness in mind as an aid to presenting your own argument.In short, this is an argumentative analysis of globalism vs. nationalism in the past and in today’s politics. Use some of your sources to define the issues and terms as they are used in today’s conversation. You may also use reliable news sources to frame the current issue. But many of your sources will be editorial or scholarly. These will be in depth arguments and analysis concerning the polarity of these two terms. And a few will be primarily historical.You will first present the scope of the issues and move on to what approach you determine is the better course and why. It is highly encouraged that you put together an outline of your points and evidence. It is also highly suggested that you make time to revise and proof.