What are some of the important differences in how cities in the less developed countries/regions developed (i.e. economic and political).

In reflecting on the questions below make sure to capture information the authors intended to communicate. (Hint – sub-headings, section headings or italics are indications of important points of discussion). Your summary should not be more than 5 pages doubled-spaced, 11 or 12 fonts with APA or ASA citations. Cover page and reference page not included.Summarize how Monti, Borer and McGregor (2014) would answer the following questions:What are some of the important differences in how cities in the less developed countries/regions developed (i.e. economic and political).These cities were developed for a particular purpose. What was the original purpose and does that purpose still remain?Which social group(s) benefitted the most from the social arrangement?Point 3 reflects your critical analysis of the author’s work. What this means is that as you read the chapter you are asking yourself the questions “which group(s) benefitted most, or the least, from these arrangements? Did the author identify such a group directly or indirectly?i.e. if the discussion is about economic arrangements, then there are two main groups involve: colonizers and the colonized/locals. Which of these two groups benefitted the most or got the better end of the deal? In the case of Chapter two the groups may include regions/countries.REMEMBER YOU MUST PROVIDE SUPPORTING EVIDENCE FROM THE TEXT OR OTHER SOURCES TO SUPPORT YOUR POINTS.