What would be the counter arguments to the conclusion reached in #2 above?

“Meet the Teens Who Want to Get Vaccinated Against Their Parent’s Wishes” discusses the moral issue of childhood vaccinations. This assignment is to write a paper in which you apply Kant’s ethics to this moral issue. The paper should be written in your own words and structured in accord with the outline given below. This outline addresses two questions concerning the morality of childhood vaccinations. Your paper should address these two questions applying the two parts of Kant’s ethical theory as follows:1. Thesis statement.2. Give the argument for and a clear statement of Kant’s Categorical Imperative. Apply the Caregorical Imperative to the ethical question of childhood vaccinations in general. The questions is: In light of the established scientific medical evidence concerning childhood vaccinations, is it ethical to vaccinate children?3. Kant’s Principle of Humanity includes an argument for human autonomy. What is this argument for human autonomy and what does it tell us about how humans should be treated. Apply this to the ethical question of vaccinating adolescent children who want to get vaccinated against their parent’s wishes. The question for the doctor in this situation is: When adolescent children of anti-vaxxer parents want to be vaccinated against their parent’s wishes, what should the attending doctor to do?4. What would be the counter arguments to the conclusion reached in #2 above? Also, what would be the counter arguments of anti-vaxer parents to their children who want to get vaccinated. What arguments could be given in response to these counter arguments?5. What do you think about this issue and what is your argument for your position on this?The paper should be about 750 words